Conservative Religious Voters Love To Be Dominated

TPM Election Central’s Greg Sargent came up with one of the best headlines ever recently: “Rudy Dominating GOP Field Among Conservatives, Religious Voters.” My first reaction was, “Well, duh.” And my second reaction was, “Well, duh!” Why would anyone be surprised that conservatives, particularly religious conservatives, like to be dominated? Okay, maybe if you’re predicting future votes based upon past behavior. But that only works if we could apply that kind of logic and expect religious conservative voters to be consistent. What we’ve seen over the past few years is the Republican need for candidates possessing a hyper-masculine, authoritarian appeal, an appeal that trumps actual character traits exhibited by candidates like Giuliani and Thompson. As long as Giuliani and Thompson SAY the rights things and make conservatives feel safe in their hyper-masculine bosoms, they don’t actually have to believe them. Logic or consistency just do not apply.

Take Giuliani. Focus on The Family’s James Dobson has already said he wouldn’t support a Giuliani candidacy, but Giuliani still leads in the polls among those voters we would most expect to follow Dobson’s dictates (southern moderate and conservative religious). Dobson also doesn’t like Romney or Thompson. Who’s left besides Huckabee? Perhaps McCain’s recent conversion talk has something to do with a possible Dobson endorsement?

Anyway, perhaps the best development to come out of all this for Democrats is that religious right activists like Dobson and Tony Perkins (Family Research Council) are considering launching a third party candidate to run against Giuliani if he ends up being the Republican nominee. I wonder if they would do the same if Romney or Thompson end up being the nominee? Dobson has already questioned their Christian-ness on several occasions thanks to Romney’s past support of gay and abortion rights, and Thompson’s general lack of professed faith. And Thompson’s recent admission about not knowing much about the Terri Schaivo case–a watershed moment for the religious right–can’t have helped.

In a few months, we are going to see just how much power men like Dobson and Perkins have over religious conservative voters, particularly in the south. I think they’ll find that voters have left them behind–feeling secure trumps all and the hyper-masculine candidates (Thompson and Giuliani) will fight it out for the religious conservative vote.


Similar Posts:



Enjoy this post? Leave a comment below or subscribe to my feed. You also can sign up for email delivery by clicking here.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

No trackbacks/pingbacks yet.

Comments

Allow me to repeat myself: Republicans are sheep.

At the end of the thing, the hypocrites will be forced to vote for their hypocrite candidate, Rudy, and the rest of us will be forced to either vote for Hillary or not show up on election day.

No one forces you to vote. Hell, the R’s have been behind so many voter-supression ploys it’s ri-goddamn-diculous. That’s been their point all along, either make you like their candidate (that’ll happen) or become so distasteful of the whole thing you simply give up, and become another sheep. I’ll gladly vote for HRC, or whoever wins the D’s nomination, because there isn’t a D amongst that lot that I wouldn’t vote for. And not simply because that person is a D. The R’s lot of candidates is simply and completely distasteful to me, a bunch of vest-pocket Hitlers, Dobsonites and utter lunatics. I’m not afraid to vote Republican if I find an R that actually believes in things like personal freedom and fiscal responsiblity, strong defense and diplomacy.

Shame that they just don’t exist any more…..

And did I mention that I’m completely convinced that at least one of the R candidates is yet another closeted gay?

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)