Chris Dodd for President
Chris Dodd stood up and said no to the Bush Administration and many in Congress who wanted to grant immunity to telecomm companies that were complicit in warrantless surveillance. And he did so for about eight hours in as noble a use of an almost but not technically a filibuster as we’ve seen in recent years. Here’s Sam Stein from the Huffington Post:
Senator Chris Dodd won a temporary victory today after his threats of a filibuster forced Democratic leadership to push back consideration of a measure that would grant immunity to telecom companies that were complicit in warrantless surveillance.
The measure was part of a greater bill to reorganize the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Earlier on Monday, the Senate, agreed to address a bill that would have overhauled FISA, authorized the monitoring of people outside the United States, given secret courts the power to approve aspects of surveillance, and granted telecom companies retroactive immunity for past cooperation.
But the threat of Dodd’s filibuster, aimed primarily at the latter measure, persuaded Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-NV, to table the act until January. A compromise on the immunity will ostensibly be worked out in the interim period.
“We have tried to work through this process and it appears quite clear at this stage on this bill that we’re not going to be able to do that,” said Reid. “We are at the last few hours of the last few days of this year’s session of Congress… I think its very clear we’re not going to be able to move into the amendments…. I’ve spoken with a number of Senators and we feel it would be in the best interest of the Senate to take at look at this when we come back next year.”
A smile on his reddened face, Dodd was at once gracious and joyful by the turn of events. He had been arguing his case for approximately eight hours.
“I want to thank the leader [Sen. Reid],” he said. “This is an awkward time. We want to get the bill done. My longstanding concerns were over retroactive immunity. Look forward to coming back in January. And hopefully between then and January a suggestion can be made to compromise without granting full immunity…I appreciate the fact that we will not have to pursue this further.”
Dodd flew back from Iowa last night to personally rally against the amendment to the Protect America Act. After the Senate agreed, by a vote of 79 to 10, to move to debate, Dodd took to the floor. Over the course of the day, the Connecticut Democrat criticized the idea of granting immunity. Expanding on similar remarks made by Sen. Russ Feingold, D-WI, he noted that that the original FISA bill already included an immunity clause and that the courts, not Congress, should decide whether telecom companies deserve legal protections.
And even more importantly, Dodd felt that this vote was important enough to leave his campaign efforts in Iowa to argue against granting retroactive immunity to those who engaged in warrantless wiretapping.
Similar Posts:
- Frist Thinks All It Takes Is 23 Days
- Update on Efforts to Kill Net Neutrality
- Call Senator Ensign and Demand Accountability on S.482!
Enjoy this post? Leave a comment below or subscribe to my feed. You also can sign up for email delivery by clicking here.
No comments yet.
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>