The “Drivel” That Was My Big Tent Coverage

It seems that whenever I feel like everything is copacetic in the Reno blogosphere, a blogger decides to use their blog to criticize me publicly. It’s always been my policy not to criticize my fellow Reno bloggers–it only happens AFTER someone criticizes me publicly, and I feel the need to defend myself so that the public record reflects all the relevant facts that I respond. A few years ago, it was only AFTER another blogger criticized me publicly in the Reno News & Review that I felt it necessary to defend myself publicly. This time, Dullard Mush points out some problems he had with my DNC coverage on his blog, so I’d like to take this opportunity to make a few points in my defense.

Mush actually (and helpfully) counts up the number of blog posts published by me, Hugh Jackson, Erin Neff, Molly Ball, and Anjeanette Damon. The first important fact everyone should be aware of is that I was at the Big Tent for exactly 1.5 days. I was at Invesco field for .5 days with no access to WiFi because I do not have a phone equipped with such niceties. So let’s just do the math shall we?

Average Posts Per Day:
Anjeanette Damon (41 posts/6 days = 6.8 post per day + Tweets)
Me (12 posts/2 days = 6 posts per day + Tweets)
Ball (26 posts/5 days = 5.2 posts per day)
Erin Neff (26 posts/5 days = 5.2 posts per day)
Jackson (14 posts/4 days = 3.5 posts per day)

So by the numbers only, Damon clearly comes out ahead, but I come in at a close 2nd.

Quality:
I definitely concede this point. Although I didn’t have much time to read their coverage, I’m sure all of the other writers provided readers with more facts about and interviews with the Nevada delegation and other events that took place in the Pepsi Center. Since I know that Damon stayed in the same hotel as the delegation and was invited to attend most of their events, I’m going to assume that Neff, Ball, and Jackson worked under the same, or at least very similar circumstances. We can also assume that, with the exception of Jackson, Damon, Ball, and Neff had the benefit of superior equipment, additional staff, WiFi access, and generally had less distance to cover. While in Denver, I stayed 2 miles from the Big Tent and an additional several blocks from the Pepsi Center–to which I did not have access.

Also, I had no idea what I was walking into during the Big Tent–WiFi that went up and down, the inability to upload videos I filmed to YouTube, the heat, and a compressed schedule. I’m betting the journalists and Mr. Jackson probably got lists of scheduled events before they even arrived in Denver, or shortly thereafter.

My So-called Reader-financed Schmooze Trip:
Now I’d like to address the allegations of a reader-financed schmooze trip. One thing I made clear before going to the Big Tent is that I was going to cover the Big Tent, because my readers were interested in it, and because that is what I had access to. During my 1.5 days in the Big Tent, I had a 15 minute hand massage next to Craig Newmark in the Huffington Oasis. This is an event I thought my readers would find amusing–including the fact that there was a Huffington Post Oasis. For the rest of the time, I was schlepping around 30 pounds of equipment in 85-99 degree heat–indoors. I know, glamorous huh? I mentioned all the famous bloggers and politicos I met because I thought this is what my readers would be interested in. Apparently, Dullard Mush was not, but he didn’t chip in either, so, you know, suck it–my responsibility wasn’t to him. I’ll take criticism from those who chipped in for my trip. 15 minute hand massages: one. Parties attended: none. Heel blisters: two.

“High and Mighty Bloggers and Criticism of The Local Media”
I think Mush is somehow mistaking me for Ryan Jerz, who he is considerably more supportive of, and who spends a bit of his time online criticizing the Reno Gazette-Journal’s work. If there is any local blogger obsessed with criticizing the local media it’s Jerz. Ask any local blogger or Twitterer. In fact, you will often find me complimenting local political journalist Anjeanette Damon on her coverage. She has been far ahead of the curve in terms of using social media in her work. I do take on particular aspects of media coverage at particular times–usually when I find a problem with media coverage of women. When asking for donations, I stressed the fact that I would be a part of an alternative media event, that I am a female political blogger and would offer a different perspective than the DNC’s official blogger, and that I had been providing a forum for progressive political discussion for three years without asking for donations before. I never stated that I could provide better coverage than anybody.

What I am most offended by, however, is that a fellow local blogger would once again make such an ungenerous criticism publicly. I refrain from such behavior and keep hoping that others will as well. But now that it’s happened once again, I am required to defend myself against such criticism so that all facts are reflected in the public record. (I definitely respond in kind to comments made by others, but again, anyone looking for examples of me starting any kind of conflict with local bloggers or being critical will find that it’s almost always a response in kind.)

I have worked very hard over the last three years to provide an online space that both entertains, informs, and provokes people, always understanding that I can’t please everyone. Recently, I have also begun to promote myself as a serious political commentator. I have a feeling that Mush has more of a problem with this effort than with anything else. But as anyone knows, to be taken seriously, you must also take yourself seriously and aggressively seek out opportunities. If local bloggers resent my ambition, so be it.

More Numbers:
By my calculation, I have blogged nearly 900 days, publishing 2,644 posts that have generated thousands of comments by readers. The income I have generated from this effort after expenses is close to $500.00. If I have published some bad posts in those 900 days, well, I think that’s a forgivable offense even if others don’t. If my body of work is recognized by others outside of Reno, fabulous. A rant of two in three years during the 2,644 posts shouldn’t be taken as representative of my work. Frankly, I find that a ridiculous way to think.

The bottom line is that I did the best I could under the circumstances. I can understand if that’s not good enough for some, but I think it’s a better strategy to keep that kind of thing to yourself in order to keep the community harmonious–particularly when you have absolutely no idea about the circumstances I worked within. I think Mush would agree that being an armchair critic is pretty easy.

Once again, I thank my supporters who I am grateful to. I did not use my trip to schmooze, but to cover the Big Tent as they requested. I struggled under the circumstances I faced and most certainly could have done better, but I always had them in mind and tried to write about things that they would enjoy.

Similar Posts:



Enjoy this post? Leave a comment below or subscribe to my feed. You also can sign up for email delivery by clicking here.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

No trackbacks/pingbacks yet.

Comments

Remember a couple months ago when I got railed on for posting “too much”?

There ain’t no pleasing some people…(Not that I’m trying…)

You did whine about people not sending you money and you did make a big deal about how important it was for you as a progressive woman to provide your perspective on the convention. That would make people think you would covering the event. But you took down the post.

And your rants about not being interviewed by the state papers were in your recent posts, not in the prior 2,600.

The point is, one can be proud of their past posts and hard work. Nobody is arguing that. I think you just a) dropped the ball and missed a big opportunity at the DNC and b) seem a little full of yourself since Blogher.

You’ve already agreed that the content wasn’t your best and I think if you take a deep breath and take an objective look at some of those “why are they ignoring me” rants you will come to agree that they don’t really reflect well on you (half-joking or not).

I was glad to have met you in the Big Tent, and granted, I haven’t seen the full body of work here at RaiD yet, but if people are going to criticize your Big Tent coverage, I say f*** ‘em. (Not sure how you feel about profanity … I’m all for it myself, as you know.)

You’ve gotta have a thick skin to be a blogger (as it is with traditional journalism, I suppose), so my suggestion — in blogging as in life — is to ignore the critics and do your thing. Hell, no one criticized me (that I know of) for my DNC coverage, but if they did, I’d just be glad they were reading it. ;)

You did great. Lots of good stuff published here. In fact, I was out of town when Obama was in Reno (click on my name for a recent photo of where I was) and your report on that little townhall event was valuable to me. As were your dispatches from Denver.

I’m not sure why you think it’s not cool to publicly criticize. In my dealings with you, any criticism that’s approached privately is dismissed or countered with an unfriendly response. And, of course, emails are private, as to another of your rules. The public stuff actually seems to make you think and really respond, like this post. When the discussion goes public, it actually becomes a discussion with you. Which is exactly what you do on this site. You get out your criticisms of whatever and open it up. That’s what I’ve done (and that article was not meant to be a full-blown criticism as you paint it now. I have posted my verbatim responses), that’s what Dullard Mush has done, and that’s what will continue to happen on blogs for, like, ever. Public criticism and response is a good thing. Get over yourself.

I thought it was normal for bloggers (like talk show hosts) to attack each other just to stir up interest and readership. Frankly, I was surprised to see that you expected the local blogging community to be harmonious.

In other words, would you rather have people like you or have them read your blog? Hmm . . . maybe I should try following my own advice.

Now I will flip-flop and give a reason bloggers might want to stay on the good sides of their fellow bloggers. Anon Guy and Ryan Jerz–I don’t know whether you were ever in Myrna’s blogroll, but you’re not now. She’s the most established blogger in town, and I’ve had lots of referrals from her site (which I really appreciate!). Just a thought.

Actually they both have been on my blogroll for years. I just noticed that since I stopped aggregating posts that they aren’t there anymore. That’s a technical oversight, not a response to disagreements. I always thought it was better to support a growing blogging community–disagreements are fine, but I wouldn’t characterize this latest event in that way. Off to fix the blogroll–thanks for pointing that out.

I took down the donation posts because the links weren’t working–weeks ago. You gotta be kidding me with this…Jerz is telling me to get over myself? Pot? Meet Kettle.

I have no problem with disagreements–that’s obvious. But Jerz and I have discussed the whole idea of community a number of times. It’s good to know how you both define it and how that’s very different than me.

Bottom line, I just think people should get their shit straight and know what they are taking about. Since Mush wasn’t there, he hasn’t a clue what he is talking about.

Here’s you ball back boys–now go back to throwing back and forth to each other. That seems to work out well for you and for me.

What is with the “get shit straight?” What is there to get straight. I gave an opinion that you didn’t exactly have A-stuff up on your trip (while noting you only arrived Tuesday night and were promising more video) and that your “rants” to be noticed were kind of embarrassing. That’s an opinion not a misrepresentation of facts.

As for that donation post. It was more than just a problem with links. It was an angry post that looked like it had been pounded out in a moment of frustration. I remember commenting on it and saying it seemed out of character for you and, I think, made some quip about perhaps you were still feeling the effects of some drink you had posted about the night before. Maybe you were just tired from Blogher, but it had the same kind of “why aren’t you recognizing me” theme that appeared in these recent posts of yours. You took down that post and replaced it with another that didn’t have those thoughts, so I figured you had realized you may have come off a bit strong and a tad full of yourself in the heat of the moment. That is why your recent comments stuck out so.

In the Spirit of Ann Onn’s Post I would like to add that ALL of you suck.
And the Gleaner too.

Gee, thanks, Zeke. I thought I was being diplomatic.

What does it really mean to be “full of oneself”? What exactly is this “oneself” to begin with?!?!? Imagine, a blogger being full of themselves! I’m shocked.

About that pulled post: that’s exactly what so many ego/anal retentive/sissy/scared bloggers avoid, being vulnerable and like “for real” with their emotions. That’s why that post really stood out, Anon Guy. I think you were putting yourself in her position and feeling embarrassed (as if you wrote it)! Everyone wants to be a shiney penny, never showing/revealin anything real about themselves or how they really feel. Well, not everyone, but Myrna seems to not be so self-conscious in this way.

The problem with having a great blog, is that you set a high expectation level.

ZEKE SAYS SO doesn’t have that problem.

Anon, Deleted the posts as I was troubleshooting the link problem, Believe what you want about that. BTW, Are you the same dude who called himself “The Man” and accused me of deleting his comments that didn’t show up because they were moderating as spam because he was using the address TheMan@espn.com?

On getting shit straight–You didn’t. You counted up people’ posts as if that proved something when it very clearly didn’t, and you expressed an opinion about an event and circumstances about which you had absolutely no knowledge of. And on top of all that, you wrote that I went claiming that I would outperform the traditional media–something that is absolutely untrue.

Let’s all move on to more important things like Gustav and the RNC now. Night.

Myrna, I fully recognize that a lot of ego comes out from me. It does from you as well. So whatever about that. My get over yourself is more of a “toughen up.” Why are you afraid of public criticism? And how the hell do you expect to be taken seriously as a political commentator when you cry “I don’t do that publicly” as soon as someone calls you out? That’s utterly ridiculous. I think you get way too caught up in friendly opinions that you can’t understand how anyone could think you’re not the smartest person on the planet. Read another political blog or two about our state and you might see what I mean. There are very rational (albeit wrong) people posting the opposite view from you, and YOU TELL ME YOU DON’T READ THEM! So when someone posts that you’re a little out there and your response is that you try to play nice, but would have to admit you don’t even know what’s going on in “the community,” you come off as a major whiner. I’d hate to have that label attached to the female blogger chosen to represent Nevada at the big tent. But it was a great career move, eh?

There’s no fear of criticism. I don’t see why you guys keep bring that up. And I read most of the Nevada political blogs so I’m not sure what you’re talking about in that portion of your comment.

To be clear and once again to say: what I don’t like are dishonest characterizations of my motives or intentions–particularly those that imply abuse of reader’s donations. I wrote this post to set things straight so that everyone has all the facts so they can draw their own conclusions.

I see 16 and 17 year olds “calling out” on a daily basis. I also know that an American G.I. is on life support because someone called him out over a girl in Iraq. Jerz and Anonguy…knock it off. This is high school drama. We have enough problems in our society and in our politics as a result of “fear”…so why would you play the fear card? Must be a “Bear in the woods…” and if you don’t know the context of that - check your television and the presidency archives and how Reagan won…myrnathemynx, we hope that you continue to set the records straight. Some of us are disappointed in the disrespect of fellow bloggers…as I said before - the pioneers get the arrows. And ZEKE says…blah, blah, blah….

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)